harvesting fruits) or catalyze local communities around an emergent theme (e.g. Mapping is used in a variety of ways to display the geographic breadth of a network, to provide location-based networking resources and sometimes to make an alternative practice possible (e.g. processes of production, exchange, labor/compensation, finance, and consumption that are intentionally different from mainstream (capitalist) economic activity (Healy, 2009, p. 338).Ģ In the online practice networks and communities that form around alternative economies, digital mapping is common feature. This diversity on the ground can be described as alternative economies, i.e.
In parallel to mapping, a variety of research fields and concepts are emerging to describe this new reality: social innovation (Mulgan, Tucker, Ali and Sanders, 2007), grassroots innovation (Seyfang and Smith, 2007), third sector (Evers and Laville, 2004), degrowth (Schneider, Kallis and Martinez-Alier, 2010), commons-based peer production (Benkler, 2006) and commons (Bollier and Helfrich, 2012). Quatre axes de discussion sont explorés : (1) que peut-on apprendre de ces cartes lorsqu’elles sont comprise comme processus de cartographies ? (2) comment le concept de performativité permet de mieux comprendre la nature transformatrice de connaissances dérivées de cartographies collaboratives (3) dans quelle mesure la cartographie collaborative offre des pistes de réflexion afin de repenser la question de l’agence des citoyens dans la production de connaissances au sujet des économies alternatives et, enfin, (4) quels nouveaux défis découlent d’une reconceptualisation de la connaissance comme un commun ? Haut de pageġ Many maps show the mushrooming of grassroots and bottom-up experiments with social and ecological goals.
Un éventail d’idéaux-types et de types réels est proposé afin de s’orienter à travers les diverses dimensions de la cartographie collaborative.
#HYPERSWITCH GITHUB PLUS#
Cette étude est basée sur un inventaire de plus de 200 cartes, une recherche-action de deux ans, ainsi que des entretiens semi-directifs afin d’explorer dans quelle mesure la cartographie collaborative – une pratique largement à l’initiative des citoyens – peut être mise à profit de la co-production d’une connaissance des économies alternatives. Le but de cet article est d’informer autant les personnes de terrain que les chercheurs à propos de la cartographie collaborative appliquée dans le champ des économies alternatives. Four lines of discussion are proposed: (1) what can we learn from maps when reframed as mappings – as processes? (2) How performativity may bring light to evaluating the transformational nature of knowledge derived from collaborative? (3) How does collaborative mapping offer avenues for rethinking empowerment of citizens in producing knowledge about alternative economies? And, (4) what new challenges are emerging from acknowledging digital knowledge as a commons?
An array of real and ideal types is proposed in order to help navigate the various dimensions of collaborative mapping. The paper draws from an inventory of over 200 maps, action research, and semi-structured interviews to explore how collaborative mapping – a practice that is largely citizen-driven – may be leveraged for the co-production of (scientific) knowledge about alternative economies. The goal of this article is to inform practitioners and researchers alike about the emerging practice of collaboratively mapping alternative economies.
0 kommentar(er)
